<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / From the Press

          Double standards of the BBC's 'forced labor' in Xinjiang

          By Fiona Sim | CGTN | Updated: 2020-12-22 10:23
          Share
          Share - WeChat

          Editor's note: Fiona Sim is a London-based freelance political commentator, public sector worker. The article reflects the author's opinions and not necessarily the views of CGTN.

          According to the Western mainstream media, China always has nefarious motives behind its schemes. The latest round of propaganda against China comes from CNN and the BBC, both of which have written extensive reports on "forced labor in Xinjiang," the former focusing on the hair industry and the latter focusing on cotton picking.

          The casual reader may skim through the lengthy reports with the impression that they are well-researched, strengthened by the positive reputation of the BBC and CNN. Looking past the low saturated, low exposure photos and contextless graphs reveals the reports' sources trace back to notorious anti-China propagandist Adrian Zenz.

          Think tanks such as The Grayzone have exposed the far right, the extremist ideology behind the agenda of German anthropologist Adrian Zenz. His obsession with the Uygur ethnic group and Xinjiang comes not out of concern but as part of his religious "mission" from God to defeat China and prevent the fall of capitalism.

          In his book “Worthy to Escape: Why All Believers Will Not Be Raptured before the Tribulation”, he dictates anti-Semitic rhetoric, claiming that Jews will "be refined in God's fiery furnace" and be "wiped out." How can someone who holds discriminatory views against a minority group be trusted with the advocacy for Uygurs?

          It is well known that the U.S. government meddles in the internal affairs of countries. Former Central Intelligence Agency Director John Stockwell spoke of the intelligence agency's major function: "to disseminate propaganda to influence people's minds" through providing journalists with both true and false information that was "pure raw false propaganda to create an illusion of communists eating babies for breakfast."

          Now that rumors of "concentration camps" have been thoroughly debunked, propaganda efforts have pivoted to repackage ordinary vocational skills centers and workplaces in Xinjiang as centers of mass indoctrination and forced labor.

          The BBC's article frames the state's centralized provision of care for children, elderly, and livestock as a negative, which contradicts the UK's own policies of up to 30 hours of free childcare for those between three and four years old, for example. It also criticizes China for encouraging women to seek employment and find opportunities outside the domestic sphere of staying home and raising children.

          This is framed as depriving rural villagers of their family life, but the global consensus on improving women's rights says otherwise. The United Nations has found that women's attainment of "regular waged and salaried employment" is a route out of poverty and a step towards gender equality.

          While job creation and falling unemployment rates are lauded in the West as positive economic growth, China's similar feats via poverty alleviation programs are designated as a state mechanism of oppression.

          An “Investigation Report on Employment of Ethnic Minorities in Xinjiang” recently released by Xinjiang Development Research Center found the following:

          "In a questionnaire survey of 100 ethnic minority farmers in Kashgar and Hotan prefectures, the vast majority of the respondents expressed that they wanted the government to organize them to work."

          There is no evidence of coercion of Xinjiang's "rural surplus workers," rather evidence to the contrary that there is greater freedom to choose jobs of their preference.

          A study by the Department of Human Resources and Social Security found 85 percent of the strong working force at Aybagh Village in Kashgar Prefecture's Gulbagh Town are willing to work outside of their hometown.

          The BBC, on the other hand, fails to include even one identifiable witness to back up their claims and relies on imaginative interpretations of strategically placed photos depicting everyday life to bolster its argument.

          The hyperfocus on China shows that the influx of articles citing allegations of "forced labor" and subsequent human rights abuses of minority groups are not sincere.

          Going by Zenz's and the BBC's standards, forced labor is very much prevalent in the West.

          In the UK, there is little fanfare over studies showing that four in 10 of nurses, who often work over 40 hours a week in perilous conditions due to COVID-19, miss meals or rely on food banks due to insubstantial wages. This figure increases to six in 10 for nurses from black, Asian, and ethnic minority backgrounds.

          Across the pandemic, key workers in the UK have included minimum wage workers in sanitation, retail, and hospital who have struggled to acquire protective equipment in their line of work.

          Workers are forced to stay in these jobs in order to survive. Perhaps the BBC would benefit from tackling the UK's own internal issues before pointing fingers at other countries' attempts to improve quality of life.

          Without China's 800 million lifted from poverty over the last three decades, world poverty would have increased. This is particularly substantial considering that China is a developing country that has gone from having one of the lowest GDPs in the world in the 1980s to have the second-highest GDP in the world as of 2020.

          As a country, China has miles to go before it eradicates all forms of poverty, but it has made some irrefutable achievements in improving the quality of life of its people.

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Top
          BACK TO THE TOP
          English
          Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品一区二区久久沈樵| 猫咪AV成人永久网站在线观看| 国产黄色精品高潮播放| 国产精品成人久久电影| 久久精品国产福利一区二区| 无码av不卡免费播放| 亚洲无人区码一二三四区| 午夜福利在线观看入口| 国产美女在线观看大长腿| 中文字幕亚洲人妻系列| 超碰国产精品久久国产精品99| 午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 亚洲一区二区三区在线播放无码 | 真实单亲乱l仑对白视频| 亚洲精品国男人在线视频| 日韩中文字幕亚洲精品| 亚洲精品97久久中文字幕无码| 狠狠久久五月综合色和啪| 91超碰在线精品| 国产精品毛片av999999| 亚洲天堂亚洲天堂亚洲天堂| 成人午夜av在线播放| 少妇仑乱a毛片无码| 亚洲国产综合自在线另类| 2020久久国产综合精品swag| 国产亚洲一区二区三区av| 国产乱妇乱子在线视频| 国产毛片A啊久久久久| 亚洲一区日韩高清中文字幕亚洲| 好吊视频一区二区三区在线| 免费看欧美全黄成人片| 亚洲欧美丝袜精品久久| 精品熟女日韩中文十区| 国产成人8X人网站视频| 午夜福利看片在线观看| 性饥渴少妇av无码毛片 | 国内精品久久久久影院日本| 在线观看成人永久免费网站| 精品国产亚洲av网站| 精品中文人妻在线不卡| 公天天吃我奶躁我的在线观看|