<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Blame game will not help contain outbreak

          By Ali Cheshmehzangi | China Daily | Updated: 2020-05-12 07:38
          Share
          Share - WeChat
          A nurse wearing personal protective equipment watches an ambulance driving away outside of Elmhurst Hospital during the ongoing outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in the Queens borough of New York, US, April 20, 2020. [Photo/Agencies]

          The politicization of the novel coronavirus pandemic by some politicians and media outlets is not surprising, because people have done so even with previous disease outbreaks. In my newest book, The City in Need, I have written that this coronavirus outbreak "happened at the wrong time and in the wrong place". The epidemic broke out just before the world's largest annual migration of people (Spring Festival holiday) and roughly at the center of the most populated country.

          Given these two factors, and considering the fluid mobility of people in today's world, it was very difficult to control the spread of the virus. What made matters worse was the lack of multinational cooperation in the early stages to contain the outbreak.

          Yet some Western leaders and media outlets are blaming China, without any evidence to prove their claim, for the global spread of the virus.

          First, contrary to what some media outlets claim, different countries have been dealing with different kinds of outbreaks, mostly brief, almost all the time. Some of these outbreaks are recurring or seasonal in nature and some are easily detectable-and containable-while others are not. But the world encounters a COVID-19-like outbreak perhaps once in a century, which makes such diseases difficult to detect, diagnose, study and treat, particularly in the initial days.

          Second, testing methods and standards were not known in the early stage of the outbreak, because it takes weeks to find the methods of accurate testing. In fact, despite entering the fifth month of the outbreak, we have limited knowledge about the disease, and how it should be treated. And many countries have little access to testing kits. So, how can a country hit by an unknown disease have testing kits and other medical equipment ready to deal with a serious health crisis?

          Third, China's response to the outbreak was fast and effective contrary to the baseless criticism of some foreign politicians. Within days of discovering that human-to-human transmission was possible, China locked Wuhan, capital of Hubei province and the epicenter of the outbreak in China-and after a few days it locked down the entire province of Hubei. In response, some foreign politicians and media outlets said China was overreacting to the virus threat, yet their countries adopted the same measures later to control the epidemic.

          Also, the stringent measures implemented by many Chinese provinces were the result of collective action at the national level. Similar actions were taken by some Southeast Asian and African countries, and East Asian states such as the Republic of Korea. This shows the outbreak would not have had such a severe impact on the other countries had they joined hands to take collective action against the outbreak right from the early stage.

          Fourth, many countries failed to prepare to fight the virus, as they didn't take strict and effective measures to control the virus at home and prevent it from spreading abroad.

          As early as Jan 30, the World Health Organization declared a global health emergency, which should have alerted other countries against the imminent danger. On the same day, the US secretary of commerce said the situation offers an opportunity to accelerate the return of jobs from other countries to the United States-and yet the US is accusing the WHO of hiding facts and favoring China.

          Besides, the European Union left Italy to fend for itself in the fight against the pandemic, and the rest of the world did little to lift the sanctions against Iran to help it contain the virus. Also, Brazil remained in denial mode, Spain allowed huge rallies to be held even as the virus was spreading, the United Kingdom delayed taking measures against the outbreak, and other countries refused to reduce the flow of tourists for weeks, so as to earn as much tourism revenue as possible. As a result, the crucial period of at least four weeks in February and March were lost, which could have been used to strengthen the global front against the pandemic.

          Fifth, several studies suggest the virus has mutated and developed new strains, which could further complicate the development of a vaccine.

          Sixth, China or for that matter any other country could not have predicted that the outbreak would become such a huge global threat. Nor is it possible for any country to predict today what the situation would be three or four months from now. But we can say for sure that COVID-19 is not going to disappear in the next three or so months-unless a cure or vaccine is developed, which appears almost impossible given the lack of international cooperation and effective global governance on public health issues.

          In short, it is unfair to blame China or the WHO for the situation the world is in today, because both have been warning against the threat the disease poses to the world. So all countries should stop playing blame games, as they don't help any country or cause, and instead join hands to find a solution to this unprecedented global public health problem and invest in a healthy future.

          The author is head of Department of Architecture and Built Environment, the University of Nottingham Ningbo China. The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Top
          BACK TO THE TOP
          English
          Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 91精品国产麻豆国产自产| 正在播放国产精品白丝在线 | 日韩亚洲视频一区二区三区| 无码一区中文字幕| 性做久久久久久久久| 正在播放的国产A一片| 国模av在线| 国产熟女老阿姨毛片看爽爽| 亚洲国产精品人人做人人爱| 大地资源中文在线观看西瓜| 国产精品久久福利新婚之夜| 亚洲熟妇乱色一区二区三区| 在线中文字幕国产一区| 成年丰满熟妇午夜免费视频| 久久精品国产亚洲成人av| 亚洲精品不卡av在线播放| 国产自产对白一区| 精品无人区卡一卡二卡三乱码| 香蕉在线精品一区二区| 四虎影视国产精品永久在线| 男人的天堂va在线无码| 国产99在线 | 亚洲| 免费超爽大片黄| 亚洲精品tv久久久久久久久久| 日韩激情成人| 实拍女处破www免费看| 国产av第一次处破| 成人欧美一区二区三区| 潮喷失禁大喷水无码| 又黄又爽又高潮免费毛片| 亚洲av永久无码精品水牛影视 | 国产重口老太和小伙| 97人妻碰碰碰久久久久禁片| 天堂V亚洲国产V第一次| 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕网址| 精品国产一区二区三区av性色| 久久久精品人妻无码专区不卡| 亚洲国产日韩伦中文字幕| 国产a在视频线精品视频下载| 亚洲av综合色一区二区| 亚洲熟妇在线视频观看|